AI Resolution Hub
A prioritized list of actionable improvements to raise readiness scores across your connected repositories.
What it is
The AI Resolution Hub is the fix queue for Agentic Foundation. It gathers every Gap, Partial, and Blocked criterion across all connected repos and sorts them so the highest-impact work floats to the top.
Use it when you do not want to open fifteen repo detail views to decide what to fix next.
Readiness scores
Where each queue item comes from: dimension criteria in the detail view.
The 9 dimensions
Which pillar each fix belongs to and why some matter more.
How prioritization works
Items are ordered roughly like this:
-
1Severity first
High gaps appear above Medium and Low at the same repo.
Example: “Add agent instructions” (High) on
payments-apiranks above “Add EditorConfig” (Medium) on the same repo. -
2Dimension weight
Gaps in Agentic Readiness and Test Coverage outrank equal-severity gaps in lighter pillars.
Example: A High gap in Agentic Readiness on
web-checkoutcan appear above a High gap in Token Efficiency onhandbook. -
3Repository score
Fixes on lower-scoring repos surface higher when severity and dimension are tied, because they move the portfolio needle more.
Example: Two identical High gaps: one on
payments-apiat 54, one onhandbookat 82. The API repo item tends to rank first.
Reading a queue item
Each row includes:
| Field | What you see | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Repository | Source repo | payments-api |
| Dimension | Which of the nine pillars | Agentic Readiness |
| Severity | High / Medium / Low | High |
| Description | Plain-language finding | “No agent instruction file (AGENTS.md or equivalent)” |
| Remediation hint | Concrete next step | “Add AGENTS.md with copy-pasteable build, test, and lint commands” |
Click through to the repo detail view if you need the full criterion list or score history.
Example: a Monday morning triage
Acme Engineering has three repos after the weekend scans:
| Priority | Repo | Item | Why it’s near the top |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | payments-api |
Add AGENTS.md |
High severity + highest-weight dimension + low overall score |
| 2 | payments-api |
CI does not run tests | High severity + Test Coverage weight |
| 3 | web-checkout |
Add .cursorignore |
High on Token Efficiency; repo already at 68 |
| 4 | handbook |
Expand README setup section | Medium severity on a repo that is already Excellent |
The lead assigns items 1–2 to the API team, knocks out item 3 in a small PR, and leaves handbook for later.
Common fix patterns
These categories show up often. One PR can clear multiple queue rows.
Documentation & agent context
| Fix | Files | Dimensions helped |
|---|---|---|
| Agent onboarding doc | AGENTS.md with npm test, npm run build, folder map |
Agentic Readiness, Codebase Hygiene, Token Efficiency |
| Contributor guide | CONTRIBUTING.md, expanded README.md |
Codebase Hygiene |
| Cursor setup | .cursor/rules/, .cursorignore |
Agentic Readiness, Token Efficiency |
Example: Merging AGENTS.md into payments-api removed three hub rows and moved Agentic Readiness from 41% to 68% on the next scan.
CI/CD
| Fix | Files | Dimensions helped |
|---|---|---|
| Run tests in CI | .github/workflows/ci.yml with a test job |
Test Coverage, Code Quality |
| Lint gate | npm run lint step that fails the workflow |
Code Quality |
| Build artifact | Docker build stage in CI | Delivery Readiness |
Example: Adding npm test to CI on web-checkout closed a High Test Coverage gap without touching application code.
Contracts & governance
| Fix | Files | Dimensions helped |
|---|---|---|
| API spec | openapi.yaml or docs/openapi.yaml |
API & Contract Design |
| Ownership | CODEOWNERS or .github/CODEOWNERS |
Governance, Codebase Hygiene |
| Security policy | SECURITY.md, branch protection on main |
Governance |
Token efficiency
| Fix | What to do | Dimensions helped |
|---|---|---|
| Ignore noise | .cursorignore excluding dist/, coverage/, node_modules/ |
Token Efficiency, Agentic Readiness |
| Split docs | Move long design notes from README into docs/architecture/ |
Token Efficiency |
| Tighten rules | Path-scoped .cursor/rules instead of always-on walls |
Token Efficiency |
A single AGENTS.md PR can clear gaps in Agentic Readiness, partial rows in Codebase Hygiene, and token-scope hints. Always Re-scan after merge to refresh the hub.
Closing the loop
After you ship a fix:
-
1Merge to the default branch
Scans read the repo snapshot at scan time. Open PRs do not count until merged (unless you manually re-scan a feature branch, which is uncommon).
-
2Re-scan
From Agentic Foundation, click Re-scan on the repo row or use Analyze from the list.
-
3Wait for completion
Usually 5–15 minutes. The hub row disappears when the criterion moves to Met or N/A.
-
4Check score history
Open the repo detail view to confirm the overall and dimension scores moved the way you expected.
If an item stays on the hub after re-scan, read the remediation hint again: sometimes the file path, command wording, or CI job name must match what the rubric expects (e.g. tests must run in CI, not only locally).
When the hub is empty
Either every connected repo is in good shape (rare on first scan), or scans have not finished yet. Check for repos stuck in running or failed status on the main Agentic Foundation list.
Scheduled scans about every 24 hours will pick up merged fixes even if nobody clicks Re-scan, but manual re-scan is faster when you are actively working the queue.